Animals -------- love and care.

Option A, "should be treated with," is the correct answer because it uses the correct verb tense and preposition. When talking about how animals should be cared for, it is appropriate to use the passive voice and say "should be treated." The preposition "with" is also appropriate because it indicates what the animals should be treated with, in this case, "love and care." Option B, "should not be treated with," is incorrect because it suggests that animals should not be treated at all, which is not the intended message. The sentence is meant to convey that animals should be treated with love and care. Option C, "should treat with," is incorrect because it uses the wrong verb tense. The sentence is in the passive voice and requires the verb "treated" to be in the past participle form, "be treated." Additionally, the preposition "with" is still necessary to indicate what the animals should be treated with. Option D, "should be treat with," is incorrect because it uses the wrong verb form. As mentioned earlier, the verb "treated" needs to be in the past participle form, "be treated," to match the passive voice construction of the sentence. The addition of "be" in this option also creates a grammatically incorrect structure.
Generative